Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
ETLB Squawk Forums    Building and Flying Related Boards    miniMax, Hi-Max, and AirBike General Discussions  ›  Predator engine opinions Moderators: Administrator Group
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 8 Guests

Predator engine opinions  This thread currently has 251 views. Print
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
PUFF
June 19, 2019, 1:21pm Report to Moderator

Ace
Posts: 1,518
Time Online: 34 days 6 hours 18 minutes
https://www.performance670.com/product-detail/predatorperformance1

I just saw this engine and wondered what your thoughts were.....

only thing other than the name Predator brings up Harbor Freight in my mind that I can think of is weight may be a problem.

Your thoughts?
Logged Offline
Private Message
Stroid
June 19, 2019, 2:25pm Report to Moderator
Fledgling Member
Posts: 21
Time Online: 3 hours 55 minutes
Without having a weight for it, its impossible to predict usefulness for our application.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 7
The Termite
June 19, 2019, 4:39pm Report to Moderator
Ace
Posts: 588
Time Online: 5 days 3 hours 12 minutes
Going to need a 2:0 - 2.5 ratio re-drive for it also, and that will add more weight.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 7
nathan.bissonette
June 19, 2019, 5:52pm Report to Moderator

Flight Leader
Posts: 118
Time Online: 1 days 9 hours 13 minutes
It looks as if the site Puff linked to, is a company that does custom engine work.  The Predator 670 shown at the link produces 43 horse for $2,500.  The base model Predator 670 is on Amazon or Harbor Freight for $800 but only kicks out 22 horse.  Get what you pay for?

Here's the real killer: the base model Predator 670 touts it's cast-iron cylinders for resistance to wear.  Nice, but the base model weighs over 100 pounds!  I hope the custom shop did something about that.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 7
texasbuzzard
June 19, 2019, 7:23pm Report to Moderator

airbike Buzzard
Ace
Posts: 1,238
Time Online: 8 days 23 hours 51 minutes
the weight can be dropped by replacing the cast iron flywheel with a billet one and get rid of all the tin shrouds that you won't need in an aircraft. 2 yrs ago i tried to adapt a vanguard 23 hp. engine for my max-103 but abandoned it. i even have a brand new re-drive from ace aviation in england.

monte
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 7
Cy V
June 19, 2019, 10:56pm Report to Moderator

Ace
Posts: 641
Time Online: 14 days 16 hours 49 minutes
I think it's interesting that they describe one of its potential uses as being for "small aircraft."


Bad spellers of the world untie!
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 7
Phil
June 20, 2019, 12:09am Report to Moderator

Ace
Posts: 1,071
Time Online: 15 days 4 hours 23 minutes
Quoted from texasbuzzard
the weight can be dropped by replacing the cast iron flywheel with a billet one and get rid of all the tin shrouds that you won't need in an aircraft. 2 yrs ago i tried to adapt a vanguard 23 hp. engine for my max-103 but abandoned it. i even have a brand new re-drive from ace aviation in england.

monte


Homebuilt in argentina successfully used vanguard twin 26hp with 1.5:1 reduction in 60"x26" prop.
If I have a chance to do it again I'll be in this route. Its cheap.



Attachment: fb_img_1560989353871_1940.jpg
Size: 63.28 KB

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 7
Phil
June 20, 2019, 12:44am Report to Moderator

Ace
Posts: 1,071
Time Online: 15 days 4 hours 23 minutes
Latest built the same engine used.



Attachment: fb_img_1560991264801_9030.jpg
Size: 38.00 KB

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 7
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Print


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread
 

Click here for The photo of the Moment